About Me

Name: Angelina Sciolla
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

They're waiting until you're all dead

“The younger generation sees itself as a multicultural generation,” said DNC Chairman Howard Dean at the NAACP meeting yesterday. “People under 35 think of themselves differently, and feel integrated [in society].”
 
So what do people over 35 think they are. Segregated?
 
I mean think of the intellectual bankruptcy of that statement. The uselessness of it....if only WF Buckley were alive to hear it. Imagine the excoriating (and largely incomprehensible to we mere mortals) reply that gem of a quote would have received.
 
Dean's comments came in the wake of his criticism of John McCain, who he sees as an old fogie with Bush plague. I have news for Dr. Dean, baby boomer. People over 35 dominate the political and economic spectra. They have the money, the power and the pharmaceuticals to keep themselves going way into their 80s and 90s.
 
Don't be dissing older people, man. They are the future - good or bad. Baby boomers are hitting retirement. There will be an unprecedented burden on entitlement programs for seniors which will translate into a serious economic issue for this country. (This is not an assertion of blame on people who happened to be born between 1945 and 1962. It's a fact.)
 
Dean's comment is also kind of flabby for another reason. In what generation did people under 35 not think of themselves differently than their predecessors? Every generation spends part of its time self-indulging, self-assessing and blaming the generation before. It's just the human right of passage. It's not an indicator of some transcendental moment in American politics. It would be a transcendental moment if campaigns and debates had some kind of intellectual integrity to them. As for this "multicultural" assertion? That is something that will (and in many ways already has) come back to bite the youngsters in the you-know-what. Multiculturalism is a myth, a feel-good academic term like "post-racial" (see my previous post). We are a country of different ethnic groups wherein thrive different languages, customs and traditions. But the ethos of America is established and recognizable. So is the language.
 
But the myth lives on amid the glamour of the "tossed salad" metaphor that has usurped the "melting pot." Check out this strongly worded statement by a young lady who was responding to a USA Today article that touched upon the idea of assimilation into American society. Be warned, old folks, Howard Dean is not your only adversary.

"Obviously, old people are not post-racial. For one thing the don't possess the conceptual apparatus for it and couldn't be if they wanted to. But they will die out. Post-racialism won't becoming prevalent by winning on the battlefield of ideas. Rather, the old people opposed to it will simply die off. In the meantime, younger people, for whom it is all they know, will just accept it as being completely "natural." For the moment, in racialist contexts, around old people, in schools, prisons, etc, they PRETEND to be as racialist as their parents and grandparents, but in their hearts they don't actually believe in it at all. Old people fall for this pretending and think their old ways have been preserved.

This is a fundamental change, and it has already happened. There is no turning back on this one. And frankly, I've been waiting all my life for it. Obama's candidacy is merely the final touch on a social change which has at last been realized. As a Jamaican-born, polyglot, multiracial American with a Czech mother, mulatto grandfather, and a hindu nephew and niece who speak spanish at home, I am looking forward to voting for a half-Kenyan from Hawaii who speaks fluent Indonesian.

It's our turn now.
 
Pepto Bismol, anyone? For more on the myth and danger of "multiculturalism," read Barrie Maguire's piece in the Christian Science Monitor.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

He makes it out alive again

If only John McCain had the same accuracy with that surface-to-air missile 40 years ago that he has today with his timely responses to these media erruptions, he'd have likely ended up back with his carrier group after his bombing run. But then the country would be deprived of a man who clearly knows how to take a hit.
 
First it was the Times and while the appearance of impropriety seems to drip, drip, drip from various newspaper pages, they won't drown him. It was a close one. Now once again he is at odds, this time with conservative radio mouth, Bill Cunnningham, who knew exactly what he was doing when he kept invoking Obama's rather unfortunate and politically unflattering middle name at a rally for McCain yesterday. Then he tried to cover it up with a supercilious response that was equally as offensive. How many muslim "brothers and sisters", as he dropped so glibly, do you think Cunningham has?
 
McCain repudiated it and in turn Cunningham now repudiates him. Why, because the candidate doesn't want to wallow in mud? The conservative wing of the party better get wise. They are in for a rude awakening. This is a new game and cute little plays on names and claims that Barak and Farrakhan are bowling buddies aren't going to go anywhere. Yes they must be raised, but as Tony Blankley explains in his column today, you don't hammer at Obama, you go at him with the surgeon's knife. You don't flatten him, you shrink him...you let the air out of the balloon and watch him wither. The bludgeoning rhetoric and style of Cunningham, et al is not going to get McCain elected. I applaud McCain for standing his ground and indicating that Cunningham's diatribe was inappropriate. I only hope that conservative talk radio listeners wake up and realize we are up against something unique here. This time dirty politics needs a clean wrapper.
 
And there is, indeed, a strategy behind this. McCain isn't just being magnanamious. Who ever knew him to be that way anyway? He's making it harder for Obama to attack him without political repercussions. McCain is positioning himself to be the wise elder statesman, something Hillary should have tried to do more without explicitly talking about "experience" and "day one." Her experience is tied to her husband. McCain's experience is his own, period.
 
But the McCain repudiation of Cunningham is part of what we refer to as "killing one with kindness." He's not being PC, he's being smart. Obama is a master of it as well, except he verges on condescending. But if McCain is any better (which I think he can be) and can keep his aim straight, he'll be smiling and apologizing all the way to inauguration day. And the radio rotweilers will just have to hold their tongues until after he takes the oath.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The burden of hagiography and loose-lipped concubines

David Brooks opines in the Times today about John McCain's record with lobbyists. It is more fact than opinion and Brooks lays out the case for McCain, while those on the other side of the table wish to languish in the minutuia of airplane rides, letters and brushes with bottle blondes. Michael Kinsley writes a Dr. Seussian send-up of the almost-scandal while trying to keep the questions about McCain's integrity going. They also run that picture with the woman in question wearing that horrible gown....I half expect her to come crawling out of a coffin and skulking around Carfax Abbey in search of little Christian infants to drain.

I am nonplussed by the whole thing. Vicki Iseman seems like a smart enough girl who did what she needed to get, ahem, a-head. And when she was able to actually ...stand before the chairman of the commerce committee, she realized she'd done alright for herself. Now if she had been able to keep her mouth shut and stop bragging, none of this would have happened. If you're truly cool, you never brag about knowing the guy at the door. He just lets you in, and your friends are none the wiser. And if, for some reason, he doesn't, then you don't look like a fool.

Mr. Weaver might have used that analogy when he told her to take a hike. And on that note, where is she?

On to more important things.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coming to Town

After abandoning this diversion for over 3 years, I was pushed to re-open it today with help of a quote from Gerard Baker of the Times of London.

"...most Americans can distinguish between the transience of policy failure and the permanence of the national ideal."

Just like most baseball fans can distinguish between a guy who will do anything to get into the Hall of Fame and the other guy who just wakes up every day to play the game he loves.

Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »